Fwd: Re: Python bindings version

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Noel O'Boyle" <[hidden email]>
Date: 22 Sep 2016 8:56 p.m.
Subject: Re: Python bindings version
To: "Maciek Wójcikowski" <[hidden email]>
Cc: "Matt Swain" <[hidden email]>, "Geoffrey Hutchison" <[hidden email]>

That makes sense. We can always add a fourth digit for Python-specific versions.

Matt, I'm kinda hoping you'll look after the Linux/Mac PyPi upload. I
don't know my way around it, but can have a look at the weekend, if
it's not sorted out by then.

- Noel

On 22 September 2016 at 20:43, Maciek Wójcikowski <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Sure. What if we bumped it to 2.4.0? Then we would loose the weird
> translation of versions 1.8.0 -> 2.3.2 (or whatever it is now). At least
> linux distributions have "python-openbabel" packages in sync with
> "openbabel". Anaconda has only one package for all files at the moment.
>
> ----
> Pozdrawiam,  |  Best regards,
> Maciek Wójcikowski
> [hidden email]
>
> 2016-09-22 21:22 GMT+02:00 Noel O'Boyle <[hidden email]>:
>>
>> The version may be bumped to force updates if something is fixed, or
>> the Pybel API changes.
>>
>> Maybe it's not important for Anaconda (not sure), but for PyPI we need
>> to increment the version to force upgrades.
>>
>> - Noel
>>
>> On 22 September 2016 at 18:38, Maciek Wójcikowski <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Is there a reason why the bindings version is not in sync with main OB?
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > M
>> >
>> > ----
>> > Pozdrawiam,  |  Best regards,
>> > Maciek Wójcikowski
>> > [hidden email]
>> >
>> > 2016-09-22 19:13 GMT+02:00 Noel O'Boyle <[hidden email]>:
>> >>
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> What is the Python bindings version that should accompany the release?
>> >> 1.8.5 or 1.9.0? Or something else?
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> - Noel
>> >
>> >
>
>